“Next, a Tax on Water?”

Australia’s ever sensible Carbon Sense Coalition defends CO2 and warns us against the far more dangerous H20.

The Carbon Sense Coalition today claimed there is more justification for a tax on the emissions of steam from a kettle on the stove than a tax on the emissions of carbon dioxide from the gas stove beneath the kettle.

The Chairman of “Carbon Sense”, Mr Viv Forbes, said that neither steam nor carbon dioxide is a harmful pollutant, both are essential to life, both are emitted by burning hydrocarbon fuels and both have some effects on weather and climate.

“We expect the government media claque and research mercenaries to parrot the prevailing political propaganda, but surely it’s time for the independent media to start promoting accurate language and real science in the global warming debate.

It’s time to “speak truth to power”.

“The Green alarmists claim that carbon dioxide is a “pollutant”? We know that many politicians lie to suit their agenda but this lie is so huge that it cannot be allowed to stand.

“Carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen are the building blocks for all life on earth. All plant life, animal life, marine life and carbon fuels such as oil, natural gas and coal are composed mainly of various combinations of these four key elements.

“When any carbon compound is burnt in a fire or digested in a stomach, the carbon combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and the hydrogen combines with oxygen to form water. These reactions produce warmth and energy for mankind.

“All life needs food and water. Carbon dioxide is the keystone for all food on earth – it feeds all plants, which feed all animals. Water is the foundation for all drinks. Thus combustion of carbon fuels provides food and drink for all life on earth. Only a fool or a schemer could describe either of these gases of life as a pollutant.

“Both carbon dioxide and water are recycled via the atmosphere, and both make our climate liveable. Carbon dioxide is an invisible gas that has a tiny climatic effect. But water in all its forms such as vapour, clouds, oceans, rivers, rain, hail, snow and ice is vastly more abundant and influential in causing changes in weather and climate.

“If we need a “carbon pollution tax” to reduce global temperature we surely need a “water pollution tax” to reduce snowstorms and floods?”


Author: Admin

Related Articles

3 thoughts on ““Next, a Tax on Water?”

  1. Why do these people keep pushing this farce? It’s nothing but a redistribution of wealth from developed countries to developing countries. Developing countries ie, China and India. All the while the UNIPCC (with George Soros and Lord Stern on the panel) is taking their cut and then funding their subsidairy,the World Bank. What do you think the World Bank’s doing with that money, building Coal Fired Power Plants in those developing countries, China and India. It’s being pushed by the media and the UNIPCC and Soros has a political and economic agenda.

  2. Well, if it is happening in Australia, then it will soon happen here in America where in CA the EPA cut off water for one of the most major agrarian production areas all due to one stupid fish that is not even an endangered species. When Obama care was being voted upon, the EPA and Pelosi said they would restore the water if the two areas Rep’s voted for it, they thankfully did not, so the people and farmers in the area now reside in a dustbowl.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *