By: Denise Simon | Founders Code
So quiet… no one domestically is reporting it. Electronic warfare/jamming and cyber are cheap tools of destruction… and then there is space. So, has the Commander in Chief — if there is one — approved real Rules of Engagement… anywhere?
(below is word for word)
***
Over the vast expanse of the South China Sea, a war without gunfire quietly unfolded, its unique impact capturing the world’s attention. On June 30th, a brief yet meaningful tweet from the official Weibo account of China’s Southern Theater Command—“Thick smoke deep in the blue sea, good night”—sparked a massive online reaction, leaving netizens speculating about the secrets behind it.
Recently, there have been widespread rumors online of an intense electronic warfare between China and the United States in the South China Sea, ending with the US deciding to withdraw.
Reports indicate that the skies over northern Philippines recently fell into an unprecedented silence, with all electronic signals cut off. Satellite phones, GPS navigation, television signals—everything reliant on electronic communication seemed to lose its vitality overnight. The twelve-hour “blackout” shocked local residents and global public opinion. This was a direct result of an intense electronic warfare over the South China Sea.
The story begins with a minor conflict between the Philippines and China. Following a fierce confrontation at Ren’ai Reef, the Philippines felt aggrieved by China’s legitimate actions, and the US, as its backer, seized the opportunity. A joint military exercise involving 29 countries was held in the South China Sea, ostensibly to showcase “unity” and “strength,” but with hidden motives—the US military intended to use this opportunity to lay newly developed anti-submarine devices on the seabed, spying on the movements of China’s strategic nuclear submarines and further restricting China’s strategic space.
However, China’s response was swift and decisive. When the US military’s P-8A anti-submarine patrol aircraft quietly dropped high-tech monitoring equipment in the South China Sea, it was promptly detected by the PLA. The Chinese Coast Guard quickly launched a recovery operation. The US military panicked, as losing this equipment would mean wasted effort, and the advanced technology could not fall into PLA hands. This sparked a sensitive reaction, leading to a battle over these critical pieces of equipment.
The US hastily deployed a joint fleet to intercept the Chinese Coast Guard vessels. With the addition of the Shandong carrier strike group, a standoff formed between Chinese and US fleets in the South China Sea. Seeing the unfavorable situation, the US immediately dispatched electronic warfare aircraft to assist the joint fleet in launching severe interference against the Chinese fleet. In response, China rapidly deployed its Y-9 electronic warfare aircraft and 815A electronic reconnaissance ship.
In this battlefield without smoke, electronic warfare took center stage. The US deployed Growler electronic warfare aircraft and RC-135 electronic reconnaissance aircraft in an all-out effort to paralyze the command systems of the Chinese fleet with strong electronic interference. However, the Chinese forces did not retreat; the Y-9 electronic warfare aircraft and 815A electronic reconnaissance ship quickly countered, engaging in fierce electronic offensive and defensive operations over the South China Sea.
The intense electronic warfare near the northern Philippines far exceeded external expectations. Ultimately, the US fleet faced an unprecedented crisis—screens full of static and a total loss of GPS signals. In modern naval warfare, losing communication and navigation capabilities is akin to losing sight and hearing. Confronted with such a scenario, the US had to choose to retreat to avoid greater losses.
The entire electronic warfare lasted a full twelve hours, plunging northern Philippines into complete communication paralysis and sparking widespread global attention and discussion. According to Taichung News, the mysterious battle gained an official tone, with retired generals critiquing the US military’s outdated electronic warfare equipment, asserting it is a full generation behind China’s.
I replied Robert, they just won’t release it, and it was nothing derogatory.
Note To Trevor Louden. I own https://magagator.com/ if this is your standard practice of stifling debate, I’ll be forced to remove your site from our recommended news articles.
This is not a threat.
Solar
Dear Solar – Hamilton is more accurate than possibly you realize. Read Freda Utleys works, involving the eventual distruction of the Nationalist Chines structure by the U.S. via both overt and covert actions. The
Chines see no deterrent to their actions, and one must be “overt and covert” in response.
The State Department is the crux. The Chinese simply should lose a property in the U.S. for every collision, or harassment of a vessel in the territories of the other Country. The Chinese currently ignore Fishing rights, bully other nations in the regions, both North, and South.
The World Court is of no value as the Chines ( CCP ) routinely break MOU’s or agreements as they see fit.
The one issue CCP cannot retaliate over in a political sense, must be used. Taking land back, especially close to our Military facilities every time their is a confrontation, is checkmate.
To mis-understand the atheistic superiorrity complex, is foolish.
FROM THE HOUSE UNAMERICAN ACTIVITIES REPORT May 1959 // Consutation on Language –
He (Dr.Possony) emphasized that Communists used the word “peace” as both a tactical term and as a long-term objective:
Peace as a tactical term means, from their point of view, the temporarily exclusive utilization of nonviolent means of conflict; that is, propaganda, infiltration, political warfare, economic warfare, and “revolutions from within,” methods suitable for conquest without risk * * *.
As an ultimate objective, “peace” simply means Communist world control. In their Communist world, there would be a proletarian world dictator. Societies no longer would be cleaved by classes and, in the “ultimate ultimate,” nations and languages would be merged. There would be no socio-economic basis for conflict. This would be the society of eternal peace,
***
Dr. Possony pointed out that there is no peace in the world today and there will be none, according to the Communist interpretation of that word, until they have conquered the world:
Dear Robert
Stop apologizing for a lazy article. My point went straight over your head.
It was literally pulled from a CCP controlled propaganda sit.
https://www.cmgm.net/south-china-sea-electronic-war/
I’ll gladly debate you on your other points.
Dear Robert, sorry so late to respond, but business comes first. Capitalist, and all that.
By the way, Hamilton didn’t write this piece.
Stepin did, from https://www.cmgm.net/south-china-sea-electronic-war/
A CCP mouth piece site.
Trevor allowed it on his site without explanation.
This article was nothing but a CCP hit piece. Truth is, in testing your enemy’s strength, one must engage on a small scale, appear weak and incompetent. (Task Complete)
The CCP just exposed all they had to offer where (ECI) “Electronic Communications Interference is concerned.
They ignorantly fell for the trap. You’re welcome.
What a Load!
Did the CCP write this BS for you?
This is the Philippines Northern fishing waters recognized by the world court. Never has belonged to the CCP.