Surprize!!! Top Communist Backs Obama “Gun Grab” Plan

Rick Nagin
Rick Nagin

A national leader of the Communist Party USA has come out in favor of Party “friend” President Barack Obama’s proposed gun restrictions.

In a current People’s World website article Fight to end gun violence is key to defending democracy,  Ohio Party leader, and Communist Party national board member Rick Nagin, openly calls for the trashing  of the Second Amendment, in favor of the “fundamental democratic right” to “live free from the fear or threat of gun violence.”

Nagin tries to build the case that the Second Amendment doesn’t actually mean what it says, that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

In the wake of the Newtown massacre, polls show the great majority of Americans are now insisting that the ability to live free from the fear or threat of gun violence is a fundamental democratic right – one that far supercedes any so-called personal gun rights allegedly contained in the Second Amendment.

In fact, the right-wing extremists opposing all efforts to curb gun violence are the same forces that rallied behind Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, hoping to undermine every other democratic right as well as the living standards of workers and ordinary Americans. It is for that reason, as well as the need to protect public safety, that the same coalition of labor and its allies that worked so hard and effectively to re-elect President Barack Obama must now go all-out to back his s for gun law reform.

As Obama has charged, the extremists recklessly “gin up fear” that the government is coming to take away hunting rifles and personal weapons owned for legitimate self-defense. Led by the hate-mongering leadership of the National Rifle Association, they use a totally fraudulent and only very recent interpretations of the Second Amendment  which they falsely claim as necessary for protecting every other freedom contained in the Bill of Rights….

Actually, the Second Amendment wasn’t enacted with any of these things in mind.  The amendment was adopted as a means to enable the new American republic, lacking a standing army or state national guards, to muster militia to put down domestic uprisings, including slave revolts, to repulse any attempted return by the British and to deal with clashes with Native Americans on the expanding frontier. These issues vanished long ago. The Second Amendment is obsolete and now has been twisted to threaten the basic safety and security of all Americans.

There is no basis for claiming this amendment was intended to permit unregulated personal acquisition of firearms, including amassing military weapons and private arsenals for “protection” from the government. No government, especially one that is new and fragile, has ever authorized citizens to arm themselves against it.

Nagin is almost right here. Only one government has – the United States of America. Thomas Jefferson and his friends knew they were creating something new. Something never before seen in world history. That is precisely why the right to keep and bear arms was included. Jefferson’s famous quote: “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants,” is ample evidence that he did not intend arms for hunting and personal defense only.

Nagin goes on to say…

Until the Reagan administration, U.S. courts rejected any use of the Second Amendment to prevent rational gun control laws, which prevailed throughout the country for over 200 years.

It was only with the recent rise of right-wing extremism, including its 1977 takeover of the previously benign NRA, that a well-financed and aggressive effort was launched to undo all gun control laws.  These efforts culminated in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision, written in 2008 by arch-right-wing Reagan appointee Antonin Scalia, that reversed two centuries of court decisions when it threw out a Washington, D.C., restriction on handgun ownership and asserted for the first time that the Second Amendment protected virtually unrestricted personal ownership of firearms.

Of course Nagin has to bring up the Oklahoma City bombing (where explosives, not guns were used), but fails to mention the earlier Waco massacre, where gunned up federal agents mounted a deadly siege against a compound containing many women and children. Rick hates the fact this own violence prone communist revolutionaries are outgunned by law abiding American citizens. If his side was in the majority, he’d be the  staunchest  defender of the Second Amendment in the country.

Personal ownership of guns now has skyrocketed to 300 million, and 10 of the 12 deadliest mass shootings in American history have occurred since 1984, six within the last five years since the Scalia decision. It is also in this period that the delusional “militia” movement took off, leading directly to the bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

According to an Alternet report there have been 65 mass shootings just since Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was shot in 2009. Guns now kill 30,000 Americans every year. That is 300 times as many as in nearly every other industrialized country, where the same mental health problems, films and video games exist but where guns are strictly regulated.

No, Rick, no other country has the proportions of youth on behavioral modification drugs that America has. Guns are very highly regulated in New Zealand, far more so than in the United States, yet we’ve had two major massacres since 1984, numerous smaller multiple killings and a murder rate per head of population comparable to that of America.

So Nagin goes on to demonize the opposition.

This is the blood and carnage that the NRA leadership, the right-wing extremist movement and Antonin Scalia have on their hands.

Having lost the 2012 election, these forces are now howling for utilizing “Second Amendment remedies” to get their way. They are goaded on, not only by the NRA, but by right-wing talk show hosts and Fox News, where commentators have responded to the president’s call to restore Clinton-era restrictions on assault weapons with calls for impeachment and warnings about “civil war” (Arthur Herman), declaring the country to be in a “pre-revolutionary condition” (Pat Caddell) and that states would be justified to secede if the “radicalized, abusive federal government” continues on its current path (Sean Hannity).

And tries to claim the moral “high ground.”

At his Jan. 16 press conference President Obama warned that winning the needed reforms will be difficult. “If Americans of every background stand up and say ‘enough!'” he said, ” only then change will come.”It is not only, as Vice President Joe Biden said, “a moral obligation.”

We must rally behind President Obama to protect our safety and security and our basic democratic rights.

A communist wants to ban citizen’s last resort means of protecting themselves from government tyranny.

Says it all, doesn’t it?


Author: Admin

Related Articles

11 thoughts on “Surprize!!! Top Communist Backs Obama “Gun Grab” Plan

  1. hi there! , I really like a person’s publishing quite definitely! write about we all sustain your communications more close to your content with Yahoo? We have to have a specialist on this place to unravel our difficulty. Might be that’s anyone! Looking forward to appearance anyone.

  2. You undoubtedly ensure it is appear very easy along with your business presentation even so locating this matter to get actually something I’m I might certainly not fully grasp. It seems also sophisticated as well as broad personally. I am waiting for your following distribute, I will seek to purchase the their hands on the idea!

  3. The Hypocrisy of Liberals and Politicians never ceases to leave me in awe. If it weren’t for double standards, “LIBERALS” wouldn’t have any standards and of course intelligent individuals realize that Politicians are void of any standards, morals or ethics and immediately prey upon the Passions of the Moment to promote their socioidiological agendas through Political Hysteria!

    It was LIBERALS who managed to legalize “MURDER” with the decisions of ROE v. WADE and DOE v. BOLTON.

    Although Murder is Murder, Liberals make a definitive distinction between the moral relevancy of the murder of a child in the womb and the murder of a child in the class room!

    Liberals Applaud and Praise the Abortionist and exhibit “NO” acrimony or outrage when they murder a Child in the Womb and yet they act appalled and feign outrage when tragically someone murders a child out side of the Womb.

    It is Obvious that Liberals are not concerned or interested in protecting the life of a Child for if they were legalized murder that they established in Roe v. Wade or Doe v. Bolton would not exist!

    Liberals are only interested in the creation of Political Hysteria, resulting from a tragedy to further their never ending agenda to have firearms banned; after all, it is rather impossible to impose their delusional concept of a Marxist Socialist Dystopia upon an unwilling armed populace!

    So, for the moment they will settle for registration of all firearms because they realize that in the end, Registration serves absolutely no purpose and the result of Registration eventually will lead to confiscation.

    History refutes any argument that favors registration.

    Liberal “HYPOCRISY” never fails to be AWE inspiring, it knows absolutely no bounds!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *