“If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which are in an advanced stage of improvement, we still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised, to furnish new pretenses for revenues and taxation. It watches prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape without tribute.” Thomas Paine: Rights of Man, 1791
“It might be demonstrated that the most productive system of finance will always be the least burdensome.” –Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist, on the new constitution, written in 1788
Ted Cruz released a video explaining his flat tax plan, which would effectively abolish the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The 70,000 page tax code, the payroll tax, the death tax…gone, gone, gone! Contrast this to Donald Trump, who has pledged not to cut government services and who has repeatedly sworn to punish companies with burdensome taxes if they want to leave the country.
The goal should be to encourage businesses to thrive by removing burdensome taxes and stifling regulations.
It is no secret that establishment democrats and republicans use taxes strategically as weapons to punish what they deem to be bad behavior (such as the “sin” tax on cigarettes) as an excuse to get more of your money, and for bribes to get votes. The federal government also bribes the states with (your) money regularly in order to make the states beholden to the federal government (this is how indoctrinating social engineering programs such as Common Core are imposed on American children).
Cruz’s simple flat tax is a stark contrast to the using-taxes-as-a-punishment policy Trump proposed in Rochester, New York this past week as reported at the Washington Post:
When he took the stage, Trump recited numbers of job losses in Rochester, naming individual companies that he would “hit with a 35 percent tax” until they agreed to return and create jobs.
“I will bring it back so fast,” he promised. “Your head will spin.”
As reported at New York’s Democrat & Chronicle, Trump “went after SentrySafe, whose parent Master Lock Co. announced last June it would close its Linden Avenue plant this year and send those 350 jobs to Nogales, Mexico, and Wisconsin.”
“If they know they’re going to pay a 35 percent tax, they’re not moving folks,” Trump said.
This is not the first time Trump has “gone after” business.
Byron York wrote at the Washington Examiner in February,
“Trump railed against pharmaceutical companies. He railed against oil companies. And insurance companies. And defense contractors. And he set himself against a political system that he said allows big-money corporate ‘bloodsuckers’ to control the government with campaign contributions.”
Trump’s solution was “to allow the government to negotiate drug prices — a common position among Democrats but rarely heard at nominally Republican events.” He also said he would “not raise military spending, arguing that the nation’s defenses can be improved without increasing its already huge Pentagon budget,” and further “promised tough sanctions on American companies that move jobs overseas.”
As president, Donald Trump has no such authority under the Constitution. But then again, Donald Trump also believes that the federal government’s role is to provide education, healthcare and “really great neighborhoods.”
Watch the video for Ted Cruz’s flat tax proposal:
Caleb Howe of Red State observed that Cruz’s proposal:
“…[is] an appeal to the actual conservative and Republican set of values the party supposedly embraces, such as limited government, reducing the burden of government on citizens, and necessarily, an increase in individual liberty and freedom.”
Back in November, Cruz discussed his flat tax plan with Fox’s Megyn Kelly. Cruz said that his plan would:
“[take] government power out of Washington and it also ends the cronyism. It ends government picking winners and losers…” [emphasis added]
Listen starting at around the 4:27 minute mark:
During a speech in Rochester over the weekend, Donald Trump said that Cruz would let companies move out of the country “no problem,” but Trump on the other hand would say, “No, no, no…they’re going to pay their 35% tariff…”
As observed at Red State, “a 35% penalty would simply put the company out of business.”
Watch starting around the 14:47 minute mark:
Trump’s assertion that he can be the king of taxing industry as president was challenged here:
One gets the sense that Donald Trump resents the mere idea that he would have to conform to the restrictions set forth on the executive office by what should be the highest binding law of the land, and that is the Constitution.
An interesting aside, way back in 1999, speaking of a one-time tax of the wealthy in order to pay the national debt, Donald Trump said as reported at CNN:
“By my calculations, 1 percent of Americans, who control 90 percent of the wealth in this country, would be affected by my plan,” Trump said.
That comment is reminiscent of class-warfare taught by Marxist university professors everywhere.
One major difference between constitutionalists and socialists is that the former believe as the founders did, in “limited government,” meaning the federal government has no power other than what is specifically granted to it in the Constitution. The power lies in the states. Socialists, on the other hand, believe in BIG government.
The Constitution was designed specifically to limit government with a deliberate, obsessive focus on checks and balances, or enumerated powers, in order to prevent one group or individual from imposing tyranny on others.
Trump, on the other hand, told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that “getting along” was the “purpose of what the founders created.”
Ted Cruz’s tax plan can be found here.
- FLASHBACK: Ted Cruz responds to ‘globalist’ smear (video)
- #FiveForFreedom: Here are the government agencies Ted Cruz wants to abolish
- WATCH: Debunking anti-Cruz myths (video)
- WATCH: Ted Cruz confronted by angry ethanol farmer; responds like a President (video)
- UPDATES: CNN, NOT Cruz staff, responsible for Ben Carson campaign suspension ‘rumor’
- To maintain credibility, CNN must apologize publicly to Ted Cruz
- 2013 Flashback: Ted Cruz speaks out against ‘Gang of Eight’ bill (video)
- More LIES: Viral video slamming Ted Cruz is a big fat fake
- No, Ted Cruz did not blame Donald Trump for #BrusselsAttacks
- WATCH: ‘AGENDA’ Producer Curtis Bowers makes the case for Ted Cruz (video)
- Yet another prominent leftist chooses Trump: Cruz is ‘a hard-line, Tea-Party style, evangelical warrior’
- WATCH: Texas Governor Greg Abbott endorses Ted Cruz for president (video)
7 thoughts on “WATCH! No more payroll tax? Cruz releases video of Flat Tax proposal”
Stop taxing income, don’t steal what I make, tax what I buy.
Fairtax.org, help pass the fairtax go to popvox,com support hr25/S155!!! The only plan that repeals the 16th Amendment!
I really like the fair tax. My only concern with it is that hidden costs can be added to it easier, while a flat tax, it is 10 percent, period. But I like the fair tax because a.) I don’t think the federal government needs to know my name, much less how much I make, and b.) I like being empowered to make the decision whether I want to buy something.
I’m curious about that 16% business tax…
Suppose company A makes widgets.
Company B buys the widget, adds an armature, and calls it a whatnot.
Company C buys the whatnot, attaches it to their radio.
Consumer buys the radio.
Assume that all the companies pay a 16% flat tax, and in the manufacture of this radio, 3 different companies were involved before the product was available to the consumer.
Also assume that each company involved in the manufacture of this radio added a 10% profit margin as it evolved into its final product.
What percentage of the final product is going toward corporate tax? And how much sales tax does the consumer have to pay?
“Atop making tremendous economic sense, Cruz’s flat tax is exactly what his campaign needs right now.
Until 11:59 p.m. on Monday, April 18, millions of Americans will spend incalculable hours coping with W-2s, W-4s, 1099s, 401(k) statements, notepads, calculators, caffeine, checkbooks, and the other mind-numbing, migraine-inducing minutiae that define tax season.
The time is now for Cruz to tell Republicans in New York and beyond that his presidency would stop this excruciating drudgery. Cruz’s flat tax features a 14-line, postcard-sized return. Today’s 1040 form contains 91 lines.”
The idea that Cruz’s plan is a VAT came up on Facebook, so I will put Cruz’s response that here:
From an exchange with Cruz and Rubio during a debate:
“CRUZ: Well, Marco has been floating this attack for a few weeks now, but the problem is, the business flat tax in my proposal is not a vat. A vat is imposed as a sales tax when you buy a good.
This is a business flat tax. It is imposed on business and a critical piece that Marco seems to be missing is that this 16 percent business flat tax enables us to eliminate the corporate income tax. It goes away. It enables us to eliminate the death tax.
If you’re a farmer, if you’re a rancher, if you are small business owner, the death tax is gone. We eliminate the payroll tax, we eliminate the Obamacare taxes. And listen, there is a real difference between Marco’s tax plan and mine.
Mine gives every American a simple, flat tax of 10 percent. Marco’s top tax rate is 35 percent. My tax plan enables you to fill out your taxes on a postcard so we can abolish the IRS. Marco leaves the IRS code in with all of the complexity. We need to break the Washington cartel, and the only way to do it is to end all the subsidies and all…
… the mandates and have a simple flat tax. The final observation, invoked Ronald Reagan. I would note that Art Laffer, Ronald Reagan’s chief economic adviser, has written publicly, that my simple flat tax is the best tax plan of any of the individuals on this stage cause it produces economic growth, it raises wages and it helps everyone from the very poorest to the very richest.”