Trevor Loudon Interviewed by Ginni Thomas of the Daily Caller

Trevor Loudon, an author and blogger from New Zealand who has spoken to over 200 tea party groups in 30 states, decried the “normalcy bias” that blinds Americans from seeing a future America without liberty, the Constitution and military strength in an interview with The Daily Caller.

“When you grow up like that [with a strong national history], you think it’s going to go on forever,” Loudon said. “But there’s no law of nature that guarantees that.”

But, “if America fails, and America is in danger of failure — that is a harsh reality — if America fails, the West goes down,” he said. “Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, North Korea, Nicaragua, Venezuela and the crazed Islamic allies will carve up this planet amongst themselves. And, if you think the Dark Ages were a tough time, I think it’s going to be pretty bleak for a very long time.”

“We’ve been very, very lucky for the last sixty years that the most benevolent power the world has ever seen, the strongest military power the world has ever seen, it’s America that’s been leading the world, not Russia, China or Nazi Germany or someone like that.”

Loudon noted the irony of President Barack Obama and his Democratic allies calling the tea party “extremists” and “terrorists.”

The tea party, he said, is the “most patriotic, gentlemanly, fair-minded, generous, peaceful people — the exact opposite of terrorists. Yet, you have people in your Congress, mostly in the Democratic Party, who are allied to supporters of North Korea and Iran and Venezuela and Cuba and Communist China.”

“You’ve been infiltrated, and the infiltrators want to deflect attention off what they’re doing by basically demonizing the most patriotic, inoffensive people in this country, the tea party and their sympathizers,” he explained. “It’s Orwellian — truth is lies and lies are truth.”

With these attacks, Loudon said, the Democrats are merely “disguising their own anti-American activism.”

In his book, “The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress,” Loudon names over 50 members of Congress who have radical connections to America’s tadversaries. He discussed Reps. Judy Chu, John Conyers and Rosa DeLauro.

Certain member of Congress “couldn’t pass a basic security clearance to clean a toilet in any military base, and neither could your president, by the way,” he said.


Author: Admin

Related Articles

18 thoughts on “Trevor Loudon Interviewed by Ginni Thomas of the Daily Caller

  1. Mr Loudon,
    Recently discovered you and your work. Thank you.
    Your friend, Mayesa dasa
    you may like to contact Dinesh D’Zouza for contacts for publishing your work as a movie.

  2. So enjoyed Trevor Loudon when he spoke to our Jackson Madison County TEA Party here in Jackson Tn. Thank you again, Trevor!! Thank you for standing up for truth and for encouraging us!!

    In HIM,

    lucy in TN

  3. Fair commentary, Trevor; thank you for all your good work for this country. BUT –

    You need to research our Constitution further, as to why its Framers put in it the requirement for a candidate for the office of the presidency – and that particular federal office ONLY (with the VP office added later) – to be a “natural born citizen” – NOT just a ‘citizen,’ whether native born or naturalized. It was because the person occupying that office would ALSO be the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces; and they didn’t want anybody in that position to have CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES – like a DUAL CITIZEN would. And that’s why Obama was an ineligible candidate – and is an ineligible, and thus illegal, president. And that’s why Ted Cruz can’t be a candidate for that office – as I say: and that particular office ONLY (plus the office of the VP now as well; added later in case the VP needed to move into the top job, for whatever reason).

    The hard evidence for that reading of the matter is 3-fold: 1) the letter at the time of the Constitutional Convention to G. Washington, Chair of the Convention, by John Jay – later to become the first Chief Justice of the new U.S. of A. – drawing his attention to the desirability of the requirements for the office of the president to include that form of citizenship; 2) the fact that Alexander Hamilton made a proposal to the Convention that a candidate for that office be merely a ‘citizen’ – and it was REJECTED; and 3) the known familiarity of the delegates at the Convention (especially their ‘grand old man,’ esteemed elder Benjamin Franklin) with E. de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations,’ which made the case for a “natural born citizen” being a person born on the soil (jus soli) of two citizen parents (jus sanguinis). Lawyer Mario Apuzzo (, who has studied this matter in depth and posted his findings in depth on his website, makes a clear case that the delegates were going by American common law – Natural Law – and based on de Vattel’s take on this matter, not English common law; under the latter of which it speaks of ‘natural born SUBJECTS’ as needing only the father being a British citizen. The delegates to the convention coming up with a constitution for a republic of freemen – sovereigns, not subjects – would hardly be going by English common law, as some Obamabots have tried to make a case for, to get around Obama’s ineligibility.

    I urge you to research this matter. You are misleading your audiences and readers by suggesting that Senator Cruz would make a good president. Yes, he undoubtedly would. And. there’s a little matter standing in the way of that suggestion.

    It’s the law of the land. Aka the Constitution.

    Which has gone through enough trashing already. As you have indicated.

    But take heart. Wouldn’t it be fitting justice for Sen. Cruz to announce that he will not be running for the office of the presidency, because he is not a ‘natural born’ citizen – and neither is Mr. Obama???

    Anyway – first things first: the clarifying of this issue.

    Other than that, I have great respect for the research that you have put in, regarding all this. Indeed: As America goes, so goes Liberty. And for the world, let us not forget.

        1. You are welcome Stan. Did you read onto the next letter Jay to John Adams?
          “…It is to papers in this office that future historians must recur for accurate accounts of many interesting affairs respecting the late Revolution.”
          ~ John Jay

          In my haste I forgot to Thank You Trevor Loudon for all of your hard work.
          Thank You so much for sounding the alarm and sounding it again and again and again. You are a true Son of Liberty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *