Nancy Pelosi Pushes “Agenda 21” in 1992

Many conservatives and Republicans still have no concept of what Agenda 21 is all about. Many of them actually vote for Agenda 21 related programs. Many still deny that it even exists.

Agenda 21 does exist. It is real. It is basically a United Nations plan to socialize the United States under the cover of environmentalism.

Here leftist congress members Elliot Engel and Nancy Pelosi pushing Agenda 21 in the US Congress in 1992.

Hat Tip: American Thinker


Author: Admin

Related Articles

7 thoughts on “Nancy Pelosi Pushes “Agenda 21” in 1992

  1. In the USA one ‘federal’ dollar spent costs 10 times more than a similarly spent ‘state’ dollar simply because of the necessary added bureaucracy (agencies salaries, benefits and pensions, office complexes, information/documentations systems, vehicles, energy/maintenance costs, etc), also the more complex the bureaucracy the easier it is to siphon off or redirect money for ideological or corrupt purposes.

    This happens with every new ‘program’ and the UN is increasingly getting itself inserted (imagine your taxes for ‘world’ dollars). These expensive agencies produce nothing and generate no revenue. Now imagine what an ‘international’ or ‘world’ dollar would need to cost you (your higher taxes -absolutely) to regulate ‘you’ and your private property by unelected foreign national elitist technocrats.

    The EPA is now working ‘internationally’ (INTERNATIONALLY’?) with the UN; The EPA has awarded a five-year, $2.5 million grant (US citizen’s taxes) to the UNU Institute for Sustainability and Peace (UNU-ISP)… yaxpayer funding UNU since 1972, how’s that ‘sustainablility and peace’ going UNU? Yaxpayers are paying for the UN ‘World Tourist Organization’ (UNWTO), another tax black hole along with UNESCO & ICLEI, now finally being exposed in their war on private property rights & liberty -Agenda 21. The USA is funding 22% of the UN budget which funds also the IMF and WB (yep they’re both UN agencies), think CNN or NBC will tell you how your taxes are being spent? But that 22% you see in Wikipedia dosen’t include all the ‘back door’ funding (your taxes).

    Did the EPA first mention that to the US congress or taxpayers or the people freezing in New Jersey? This is (actually ‘you will’ pay) for clean up of ‘e-trash’ around the world (around the world?), at least that is what they are telling us what the money is for…and where the fek did the EPA get the money? The EPA can ‘deem’ law now, so it can, shut up (see below).

    So,the USA taxpayer is providing the world’s libraries with $6,000 >each<, (google it) Kindals that is creating some of the "e-trash" and now we are the world's trash collectors?

    “for Sustainability and Peace” right.

    …and this:

    'Should Law Enforcement Agencies Have The Power To Write And Enforce Whatever Laws They Desire?'

    Posted on August 4, 2011

    "This is how unelected bureaucrats, such as those in the EPA, can write law that wasn’t necessarily intended by the Congress. We see it all the time. A good example are the recent new regulations being promulgated by the EPA to control carbon emissions from power generating plants that effectively will enforce a carbon cap-and-trade law that the Congress has in fact already rejected." If you write the law you can fund yourself at will. But where does that money come from? Obama's stash?

    The EPA is only one:

    Agenda 21 (UN)

    Watch the UN's Agenda 21 in action, this is happening around the world:

    youtube: Sheriff Dean Wilson – Defend Rural America:

    – Youtube: Agenda 21 for Public Officials

    …the other giant squid; the UN
    The IMF & World Bank & it’s sovereign eating un-elected technocrats are UN agencies, do you believe the UN is there for you?

    The UN & its agencies are immune to laws of countries where they operate” – Wikipedia

    “In fact, her IMF salary of $467,940 plus an $83,760 additional allowance is not subject to any taxes. See Christine Lagarde, Scourge of Tax Evaders, Pays No Tax. No taxes is the norm for most United Nations employees …”

    Much of the membership of the UN are 3rd world dictatorships (easily bought votes) that would like nothing better than to spread western wealth to themselves through UN resolutions and regulate your every activity even your decisions on life.

    What is the UN costing (has already cost since established) and what exactly has it accomplished besides insidiously forcing it’s control already over every country’s sovereignty? The UN is the ‘regulatory tool’ of the NWO (self-imposing new world monarchy, so what does that make ‘you?).

    Remember this?

    Armed Troops Burn Down Homes, Kill Children To Evict Ugandans In Name Of Global Warming

    Prison Planet
    September 23, 2011

    “Neo-colonial land grabs carried out on behalf of World Bank-backed British company

    Armed troops acting on behalf of a British carbon trading company backed by the World Bank burned houses to the ground and killed children to evict Ugandans from their homes in the name of seizing land to protect against “global warming,” a shocking illustration of how the climate change con is a barbarian form of neo-colonialism.”

    “The evictions were ordered by New Forests Company, an outfit that seizes land in Africa to grow trees then sells the “carbon credits” on to transnational corporations. The company is backed by the World Bank and HSBC. Its Board of Directors includes HSBC Managing Director Sajjad Sabur, as well as other former Goldman Sachs investment bankers.”

    So who ultimately 'owns' the UN? …ask the Slave Queen herself:

    Slave Queen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *