The Palestinian Removal Act

By: Cliff Kincaid

Anybody who thinks a “two-state solution” will solve the Arab/Muslim conflict with Israel is not paying attention. Neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority will co-exist with Israel. The only solution is a Palestinian Removal Act, modeled after the Indian Removal Act in the United States, which stopped the Indians from murdering the American settlers and allowed the new nation to develop.  

This may sound harsh, but it is sometimes necessary to acknowledge that two peoples cannot exist together and in proximity.

Israel faces genocidal opposition that can only be resolved by relocating the so-called Palestinians back to neighboring Arab/Muslim states.

The Indian Removal Act was a last-ditch effort under President Andrew Jackson to save the American Indians from their own destruction. 

President Jackson is supposed to be a villain, as communist agitators tried to take down his statue in Lafayette Park near the White House, calling him a “killer” for removing Indians from areas of conflict in the new America to federal safe zones or havens for their own protection. Jackson offered the Indians federal protection.

As Robert Remini writes in his book on Jackson, “The Trail of Tears was a terrible price to pay for this legislation but, as Jackson predicted, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek, Chocraws, and Seminole tribes are alive today. They were not annihilated like the Yamassee, Mokawks and Pequote, and other eastern tribes.” In his book on Jackson, Sean Wilentz confirms this, writing, “In completing the removal of the Indians to what he considered a safe haven, Jackson may well have spared them the obliteration that had been the fate of many northeastern tribes.”

In other words, the Indians were fighting among themselves, in addition to their wars on the American settlers.

By way of analogy, the “Palestinians” have been fighting among themselves, in addition to their campaign to “liberate” Israel from the Jews. Hence, Hamas controls Gaza and the Palestinian Authority controls the West Bank.

But removing Hamas from Gaza does not solve the problem, and the Palestinian Authority is hardly a “moderate” alternative. It is the outgrowth of the old Soviet-sponsored Palestine Liberation Organization.

Geert Wilders, leader of the Freedom Party (PVV) in The Netherlands, has suggested the conflict between Palestinians and Israel could be resolved through their relocation to Jordan. “Jordan is Palestine,” he says.

In the past, he has put the matter more diplomatically, saying, “The two-state solution is an internal Israeli matter and I hesitate to interfere. But my personal belief is that there is a two-state solution for the Palestinians. One of those states is called Jordan.”

Wilders, whose Party for Freedom has emerged as the largest party in the Dutch House of Representatives, proclaims, “Israel is West’s first line of defense.”

“Long a Bastion of Liberalism, the Netherlands Takes a Sharp Right Turn” proclaims a shocked headline in the New York Times.

It can happen here, too.

In Israel, it’s important for what the media call the “far-right” to continue to be in charge. It is a matter of Israel’s survival.

As we see in this current conflict, many Palestinians are moving south, because of Hamas’ terrorism against Israel and the military response from the Jewish state, and Biden seems to agree with Israeli authorities that Hamas must not be allowed to return to power there. But Biden still pushes the “two-state solution,” apparently with the other state being controlled by the Palestinian Authority. This is another recipe for genocide against Israel.

Both movements are puppets of foreign states. Hamas is controlled by Iran and the Palestinian Authority is controlled by Moscow, the main international backer of Iran.

In this context, the words of Geert Wilders, who wrote the book, Marked for Death: Islam’s War Against the West and Me, are important and noteworthy. He made the point, “…although defeated Nazi Germany was subject to de-Nazification, there was no de-Marxification after the fall of communism… And without the public accounting of a trial, people tend to forget how evil communism was.”

Co-existence with communism is also impossible.

It is not, therefore, shocking to discover that communists in the United States are behind the anti-Israel protests. Our media will not tell you this story. But my report on the protests documents with photographs who is really pulling the strings.

It will take courage, such as that exhibited by President Jackson during America’s battle with the Indians, to solve these problems.

It will not be pretty but it must be done. There is too much hatred for the Jews in the world today. Jew-haters on the borders of Israel will only mean more death and suffering for both peoples. 

One thing we know is that a “truce” or a “ceasefire” will only delay the inevitable. The hostage-takers and the terror masters in Moscow and Tehran must be destroyed.

Then, and only then, can the “Palestinians” be accommodated in Jordan and Egypt and any other Arab/Muslim state that wants them.

*Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc.


Related Articles

1 thought on “The Palestinian Removal Act

  1. The Mohawk still exist, but they suffered at the hands of whites fighting their wars. Particularly the British and French. The trail of tears was uncalled for. The only reason for the trail of tears was the greed of whites.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *