Jeff Nyquist is one of the few commentators today who actually sees the big picture.
Jeff explains that the Cold War never ended and that today the West is very much on the losing side.
By J.R. Nyquist
During the Cold War the stated strategic goal of Russian and Chinese Communist leaders, and the primary objective of Communist international strategy, was to neutralize the United States as a military and economic power. This, in fact, was the only way to put down capitalism in favor of universal socialism. Looking at the big picture today, what is most disturbing about Russian and Chinese behavior, is the way present-day behavior fits perfectly with the old objective. Consider Russia and China’s ongoing arms buildup, ongoing anti-American propaganda, and ongoing support for revolutionary Communist regimes in Africa and Latin America.
There is a large and growing body of evidence that — for Russia and China — the old Communist goals remain in effect, and that the Cold War did not end in 1991.
If we consider the strategic problem confronting the Communist Bloc in 1960, we may ask how they could possibly have hoped to overturn the economic and military dominance of an overwhelmingly superior United States. Such would have undoubtedly required a series of successful overt and covert actions, including massive infiltration, disinformation and deception operations. Would anyone be surprised to learn that the last half century is the history of such operations, though the West knows almost nothing about them?
The success of Russian and Chinese deception may be judged by results. First, China’s newfound industrial and financial might, accomplished at the expense of American industry by way of unfair trading practices. Through it all the Chinese Communist Party maintains control, and uses its economic position to damage the United States economy at every turn. Could this be part of a Communist strategy? And why hasn’t anyone in politics raised this as a possible danger?
Ideologically we must admit what has happened; namely, the neutralization of anti-Communists by designating them “McCarthyist. Also there is the curious disinformation lie alleging the defeat of Communism in the Cold War despite subsequent Communist victories in South Africa, Congo, Angola, Venezuela, Brazil, and Nicaragua — not to mention the United States itself, where stealth Communism advances under a variety of misleading banners.
The ongoing expansion of the Socialist Bloc cannot be purely accidental. Somebody has done it, and they have done it in concert with Moscow and/or Beijing. The fact that Lenin’s statue in Kiev Ukraine was only toppled a few days ago, begs the question: Why has there been a statue of Lenin in the heart of Ukraine’s capital city these past 22 years? Surely there must be some misunderstanding with regard to the actual political situation in Eastern Europe.
In fact, it seems quite obvious that the supposed collapse of the Soviet Union was indeed part of a game, a conscious and devious policy which has enabled secret Communist structures here in the United States to take control of the administrative branch of the federal government.
This assertion, seemingly out of step with prevailing opinion, is nonetheless obvious to a careful strategic observer. It is not obvious to the typical media consumer. But even those who are unschooled may yet acquire a degree of certainty about what is happening if they read the writings of high-level Socialist Bloc defectors.
According to high-level Czech Communist defector Maj. Gen. Jan Sejna, writing in 1982, the Soviet long range strategy always envisioned the advent of a “progressive” president in the USA whose term would coincide with an economic crisis. I also heard this plan described by American Communist activists during meetings in the early 1980s. The idea was to take over the Democratic Party through its Left Wing and elect a stealth Communist president. Given the research discoveries of Trevor Loudon, which clearly identify Obama as the creature of a Marxist milieu, there is little reason to doubt that the Communists have successfully set up a president who can further their strategy.
Russian and Chinese analysts expect the present economic crisis to worsen, and there is little doubt the Russians and Chinese are working toward the US dollar’s demise. At the same time the Left has increased domestic social spending in the United States to such an extent that military spending is now being choked off. This play is so obvious, and so in keeping with stated long-term Soviet strategy, that what we’re seeing cannot be an accident. It is something the far Left is consciously working toward.
To understand their policy it is important to remember the revolutionary ideology of the Communists. They are agents of radical change who threaten to upset the lives and well-being of countless millions of people. They fully realize that their project is likely to inspire a violent backlash. And that is why the nuclear disarmament of the United States is such an important part of Obama’s program. If he doesn’t dare order the elimination of the remaining United States arsenal he can nonetheless degrade the arsenal’s reliability through administrative strangulation. If he succeeds, he will enjoy long-range fire support from Russian or Chinese missiles.
I believe a close investigation of our strategic nuclear posture will show the alarming extent to which the Communists have already achieved their goals.
There is one further thought that everyone should keep in mind. Even the United States, with all its moral idealism in foreign policy, could not resist using nuclear weapons against enemy cities during the Second World War. Japan could not retaliate, which is what forced them to surrender. Given the fact that Russia and China are run by gangster dictatorships, nothing on earth will prevent them from bombing the United States or any other country once the American nuclear arsenal is shown to be entirely defunct. The various puppy-sized nuclear powers in the world have too few weapons, with inadequate delivery systems for penetrating Russian ABM defenses. Their deterrent value is dubious, and they will be forced to disarm if the United States collapses.
The Russian and Chinese leaders, distinct from the people they rule over, hate and fear the United States. It is the one and only country on earth capable of checking their aggression. If not for the United States, Europe would be under total Russian domination along with the Middle East. The same can be said with regard to Asia and Australia/New Zealand, which would quickly fall under Chinese Communist domination if America collapsed. Such are the strategic realities of our time.
It is therefore easy to see what kind of game is being played — strategically — both inside the United States and around the world. The fact that 110,000 Cuban agents, troops and police have infiltrated Venezuela and are used against indigenous protesters, or that Nicaragua is constructing advanced military bases for Russian use, or that President Obama shook hands with Raul Castro at the funeral of Nelson Mandela, provide data points which are but the tip of a larger strategic iceberg.
Readers may deny the truth at their own peril. And the peril is great indeed. We haven’t many years left before the enemy’s hold proves fatal. The blindness of the West is due, in part, to the success of a massive deception strategy. While this brief essay attempts to make a few general points about the true state of affairs, it seems unlikely that the deluded many have the time or inclination to question the mountain of nonsense that has been spoon-fed to them in recent decades. We can only hope that the unfolding calamity of the present will trigger that glimmer of curiosity and patriotism which has so far been absent.
21 thoughts on “The Big Picture”
This allows you length to incomparable moving in to your new family home.
These listings willl often include magazines, newspapers, and forums.
A number of the a few reassons a person should think of this as career.
my homepage … real estate purchase contract utah (scaffoldingteignbridge.co.uk)
May bee the speaker a successful real estate master? Selecting ann effective realtor is often a challenging task.
The second step is to be sure of whether all the sections are level or.
Look into my blg post :: capital gains
Think of marriage as a business relationship. You’re no longer
hooked on one realtor for many your home-buying requirements.
At this particular time, inflation hit longer than 20% and home loan interest rates were of up to 18%.
my weblog ::
Realizing which resources to make use of and how to operate them
is essential to any ambitious plumber. The center 5000-year acquired between $25.87 annd $14.68.
my site :: http://www.yelp.com
Do your sinus, allergy or cold symptoms seem to bbe immune to
remedies? So toe-nail & base infectiopn is merely form
on your feet. You need to continue reading, it might jujst save your life.
My homepage … yelp.com
The training includes not only what to eat, but what in order to mention eat.
Regular workouts are great whenever you are hoping to lose free
weight. The hornone ghrelin has been released, and really should
Here is my web page; theflexbelt.Tk
As far as windows are concerned; always chesck the drip route in
the silll for just about any clogging. Attempt to remove the packet in one whole piece so you can replace
Feel free to visit my web-site – Mold Testing Denver
For the subjects of the Moscow-run state, Vladimir Lenin’s figure has a sort of ‘double’ function. Sure, he was considered a proletarian revolution prophet. But he also bears a ‘founder of the Soviet state’ capacity. Whereas the absolute majority of Russians never was infected by communist ideas the way so many Westerners were (really, the Russian intellect is shaped quite differently for that – look at the entire prehistory), the second function remains valid like it used to be all the Soviet decades long.
Who’s actually a ‘Russian’?.. That’s the one who sees Moscow as the center of the universe. And what do we have just in the middle of that focal point?.. Right – the Kremlin AND the Red square in one complex. And what, finally, forms the very centerpiece there?.. The mausoleum with Vladimir Lenin within. That’s approximately the core of the statehood idea. There’s a clear continuity pattern placing Lenin, however paradoxically, into a succession line along with ALL Russia’s rulers – from Moscow princes (well, OK, we probably may start even with the Tatar Khans, or, with some conceptual effort, with the legendary Varyags), Russian Czars and emperors, through a chain of Soviet leaders – up to Mr. Putin. I’m serious about that as I only could be. And look at the current official ‘state idea’ in Russia for more evidence.
So, the communist (Marxists) ideology (with Marxism-Leninism being a DENIAL of classical Marxism in fact) is only part of the story, while the eternal Russia entitled inherently for a global mission, is another, the PREDOMINANT one.
I understand, that perception, suspect of ‘russophobia’, may appear so much politically incorrect for a cultivated foreigners’ mind. The more difficult is it to be challenged.
Thank you Trevor. Note in Gulag:
Beware the communist leaders of Moscow and Bejing.
Americans, beware the collectivist leaders of Washington, D.C., lower Manhattan (and San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Connecticut, etc.) even more. And they have been here generationally as long or longer then the others have been there. George Washington even warned of them in a letter.
Beware the corporatocratic collectivist leaders though money and influence all along, out of Frankfurt, London, Bern, Brussels, etc.
Those are the ones, immediately after our own domestic/global collectivists, to be concerned about, the most. There is the locus of the effort, and for a long time. Those are the helmsmen.
Questions: Where did Vladimir Lenin get rescued to, when he was pulled out of Russia? In which three nations did he live, before going back? (And for extra credit, what was his Saint Petersburg cell charged to do, besides spread Marxism in Russia? What other sub-continent?)
Questions: What was Norman Dodd told, by H. Rowan Gaither of the Ford Foundation, regarding the use of communism and Communists?
Questions: What did the CIA collaborate with the the Ford Foundation to do, perhaps before, perhaps during, and surely since that time? (I’ll answer that one: make sure that the globalist collectivist movement didn’t go to Mow/Kim/Pot extremes but was more usefully and sustainably implemented.)
America’s worst enemy is here in America and it is a global hydra.
“though” = through
Mow = Mao (must pay my proofer more)
And likewise, thank you Mr. Nyquist.
I believe you both can see how this staged reformations of the USSR and PRC fit the scenario alluded to in the above comment. The entire world is being shifted to “state capitalism” beholden to the central bank cartel and cartelizers. And yes, many of them are ideological too, as their FKA-Illuminati “thought leaders” and money directors recruit, breed, indoctrinate, and influence them to be.
Your proposition that the barbarians of old from the East (Moscow – Beijing), who still dream of empire, are somehow being manipulated by a secret bunch of very rich and/or very powerful people from “Frankfurt, London, Bern, Brussels, etc” is puzzling. It could even be seen as disinformation propaganda from those Eastern powers.
The staged reformations (and what major “reformations” are currently in place in the PRC?) were not to convert to a global capitalist system, they were to dupe us into thinking we won the Cold War, so that the other side could come back later in a surprise attack and wipe us all out. World War will ensue, and much capital will be destroyed, which is a minor thing when compared to the number of human lives that will be snuffed out.
Get out of here with that garbage, Arlen. If Jeff Nyquist or Trevor Loudon believed that Bircher crap they’d join the club. Your post is insulting to intelligent people, especially those who understand where Nyquist and Loudon are coming from. You don’t hear Cliff Kincaid spouting that half-baked nonsense. Did Yuri Bezmenov mention these things in his 1984 interview with G. Edward Griffin? No. Why not? Because it’s crap. If Griffin would have brought such things up Bezmenov probably would have called him a gullible fool to his face. It is not fit for serious discussion unless that discussion is focused on the likelihood of it having originated in the Lubyanka. Whether it originally came from there or not, this type of nonsense is just what the Comrade ordered.
While you’re chasing myths, reality is chasing you.
Do you speak for Jeff Nyquist or Trevor Loudon? What “Bircher crap” are you specifically referring to? You appear pretty agitated. Help me out here. What specifically do you take exception with in Arlen’s comment? Are saying trying to tell us G. Edward Griffin would consider the notion of an international bankers’ cartel claptrap? Huh. I don’t recall reading that in Griffin’s book The Creature from Jekyll Island, quite the opposite. I look forward to your further elaboration, sir.
Brent, I think you need to re-read my reply to Arlen. My comment was that Bezmenov would have scoffed at Griffin had he proposed that it was all a bankers plot. Not the other way around.
If you share Arlen’s opinion then you are under the spell of Kremlin-directed lying propaganda. You can either continue on believing lies or you can go to Amazon and order Golityn’s books, Nyquist’s book, Sejna’s, Douglass’, and Trevor Loudon’s. Once you’ve read them you will come to realize the error of your ways.
I have no dislike of G. Edward Griffin or the average Bircher. As far as I know, most of them mean well. But no good comes from accepting the belief that money trumps the awesome power of the State. It doesn’t. It is absurd on its face. It is simply wrong, and you are wrong, if you believe that nonsense. Bank of America does not field an army. Goldman Sachs has no nuclear weapons. Citibank is fresh out of fighter jets.
There is no need for me to speak for Nyquist or Loudon. Nyquist wrote a geo-political weekly column for 15 years or more. His writing, podcasts, and videos are readily available online. Loudon has kept this blog up for quite a few years now. They obviously speak for themselves, and they aren’t saying what you and Arlen are. Not at all.
Bank of America does not field an army. Goldman Sachs has no nuclear weapons. Citibank is fresh out of fighter jets. Deutsche Bank and the Bank of England are not in the biological weapons business. Russia and China, however, are. They also have an army of intelligence professionals whose job it is to confuse you, and this they have done.
This isn’t Zerohedge.