Marxist activists brag about blocking people from inauguration
#DisruptJ20 idiots (via Twitter)
While Marxist activists have been bragging all over social media about blocking Americans from attending President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the mainstream media excitedly and predictably reports that former President Obama had more attendees for his inauguration.
It is impossible to know if there really were smaller crowds at the inauguration, simply because the mainstream media is completely untrustworthy. But if it is true that President Trump’s crowds were smaller than Obama’s crowds, it certainly did not help that Marxist activists and their intimidating useful idiots have been openly calling for violence:
And not to mention that these same thugs have been bragging that they have been successful in blocking potential attendees from reaching the inauguration: Read the full story »
The Denise Simon Experience – 01/19/17
The Denise Simon Experience
Hosted by DENISE SIMON, the Senior Research / Intelligence Analyst for Foreign and Domestic Policy for numerous flag officers and intelligence organizations.
SEGMENT 1: Larry Schweikart, author of Part1 The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents, fascinating history lessons.
SEGMENT 2: Joel Pollak, Editor in Chief and counsel at Breitbart and co-author with Larry Schweikart of ‘How Trump Won’ the background on how Donald Trump won the White House.
SEGMENTS 3 & 4: Patrick Dunleavy, author of The Fertile Soil of Jihad and former Inspector General of the New York Prison system explains terrorists and radicalization in the U.S. prison system.
THURSDAYS: 9:00PM (eastern) on:
WJHC – Talk 107.5FM
WDDQ – Talk 92.1FM
WLBB – News Talk 1330AM
And on her Digital Flagship Station: RED NATION RISING RADIO – The NEW Dominant Force in Conservative Talk Radio
How Obama’s CIA Manipulated The Media
By: Cliff Kincaid | Accuracy in Media
The CIA and its media allies have thrown everything but the proverbial kitchen sink at President Donald J. Trump. Media bias, anonymous sources, and intelligence “garbage” have been on display. But the 25-page Intelligence Community report on alleged Russian hacking activities deserves special consideration, since a significant part of it relied on analysts hard at work watching broadcasts of Russia Today (RT) television. You wouldn’t know it by reading the report, but RT has historically been a mouthpiece of “progressives” favorable to the Democratic Party. Indeed, the Obama administration saw RT in the past as part of the “progressive” media organizations supporting left-wing causes.
Not only that, but RT was useful in disrupting the 2012 Republican presidential primary. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) dismissed my well-documented 2012 complaint about RT’s open support for libertarian Ron Paul and his pro-Russia views. We cited evidence that RT was funded by the Kremlin and prohibited under law from intervening in U.S. elections. The FEC dismissed the complaint, saying RT was a legitimate press entity and a U.S. corporation with First Amendment rights.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which supposedly monitors extremists, found nothing objectionable about RT when its own “Intelligence Report” Editor Mark Potok appeared on the April 26, 2010 edition of Russia Today’s “CrossTalk” program to discuss the rise of “right-wing” groups and so-called “Christian militias.” That was at a time when RT was seen as an important “progressive” outlet.
Read the full story »
Obama’s Iranian Nuke Deal Is A Major Challenge For Trump
By: Roger Aronoff | Accuracy in Media
No matter how false and misleading it is to cite the Iran deal as “signed,” when it is little more than a set of unenforceable political commitments, the news media continue to publish fake news arguing that somehow Iran and the P5+1 have agreed on a single text of the deal. In reality, the Iranian parliament endorsed a different version of the deal than was supposedly accepted by the P5+1, and the JCPOA was agreed upon without signatures or signatories.
Now President Obama is using a news organ of the U.S. government, RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty, to sell the narrative that this is a signed deal. “Rohani has been accused of overhyping the agreement and being duped by Washington and five other world powers at the negotiating table,” reports Frud Bezhan for RadioLiberty. “In many ways, it mirrors the situation in the United States, where supporters have fended off consistent opposition to the Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action (JCPOA), in which Tehran agreed to curtail its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief, since it was signed in July 2015” (emphasis added). In other words, American critics should stop complaining because the Iranians don’t believe the deal benefited them either.
How can the author of that article not know that the Iran deal was not actually signed? It was the State Department’s Julia Frifield who sent a letter to Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS) saying that the Iran deal is “not a treaty or an executive agreement, and is not a signed document.” Rather, she wrote, this deal represents “political commitments” between Iran and other nations. How, exactly, can policymakers politically commit to something that the parties have not agreed on in writing, validated by signatures? There is no such document, and this news article is little more than government-funded propaganda.
Read the full story »