AIM Editor on Conservative Commandos Radio Show about Benghazi

Accuracy in Media

A protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames

AIM Editor Roger Aronoff appeared last week on the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Conservative Commandos Radio Show to talk about his recent article, “Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi Releases New Report; Press Conference on Wednesday.”

The Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi held a press conference on June 29 discussing the Obama administration’s dereliction of duty during the September 11, 2012 attacks. The report we issued is “an easy read, certainly compared to the 800-plus page Gowdy report,” noted Aronoff on the radio show.

“Well, look, Gowdy [and the Select Committee on Benghazi], they interviewed a hundred people under oath, and they had access to a lot more things than we did,” continued Aronoff. “But, they just kind of put it out there and said, ‘Look, read it. It’s 800 pages, come to your own conclusions.’ They failed to hold people accountable.”

President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should be held accountable for blaming the attacks on a video with full knowledge that these were terror attacks.

“This was several days later, [when Clinton was] telling [the family members of the deceased] that ‘we’re going to get that guy that made that video,’ when [she] knew in fact that the video had nothing to do with this,” said Aronoff. “We know that she knew that because of her email to Chelsea that night, her emails and transcript of her calls to the Egyptian prime minister and the Libyan president saying this was al-Qaeda related.”

Clinton and Obama must also be held accountable for helping to arm the Libyan rebels in the first place. “So, what we did, we facilitated the delivery of weapons to these al Qaeda and al Qaeda-related groups in Libya,” said Aronoff on the show. “And Christopher Stevens, he was not ambassador at that time, but he was an envoy to these groups. He was there at the docks when these things were being unloaded.”

“And what we learned from the Gowdy report this time is that there was this Deputies meeting at 7:30 that night where the power was basically transferred from Panetta in the Defense Department to Hillary at the State Department and, thus, the call to let the planes go,” said Aronoff. “We learned that the [military] changed uniforms four times because they were so sensitive to how the Libyans would feel if we sent in people in military uniforms versus civilian clothes. I mean, it’s that crazy.”

Despite Clinton’s and Obama’s blatant dereliction of duty, the media continue to look the other way. “But NBC, CNN, they figure if they don’t come and listen it didn’t really happen,” said Aronoff. Instead, he said, “everyone [in the media] is looking for how they can just blow off the Gowdy story and the whole thing.”

You can listen to the complete interview here.


Related Articles

1 thought on “AIM Editor on Conservative Commandos Radio Show about Benghazi

  1. I find it ironic how this Administration’s attempt to attribute Benghazi to an anti-muslim video has confounded both media and political personalities alike. Had they been doing their job and been cognizant of global politics, they’d see the answer in plain view: the Istanbul Process, a global initiative Clinton co-initiated with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The Process (“>Resolution 16/18”) is the back door implementation of the UN Defamation of Religion Resolution which could ultimately criminalize free speech. In other words, should a person’s critique of Islam (or anything else) “incite” another to commit acts of violence, that person would be subject to criminal prosecution. The OIC has pointed to the Jutland Post cartoons and Florida pastor Terry Jones’ Burn and Koran Day as examples of an infractions which would be subject criminal prosecution.

    Watch Hillary Clinton launch of the Istanbul Process (here.

    According to the OIC, “We need to maintain a kinetic focus on squarely addressing grey areas like the interface between freedom of opinion and expression and freedom of religion that have clearly emerged as issues of valid but at times competing concerns.”

    I believe this Administration fully intended to advance the OIC’s agenda and test the waters whether or not they could criminally prosecute the individual who uploaded the video. It was fortunate for us that the presidential election season brought with it scrutiny which made the Administration shy away from this claim. This administration was fully aligned with this OIC’s position the uploader of the anti-muslim video and the Terry Jones event were prosecutable offenses or, (in their words, these “two incidents demonstrated serious repercussions of abuse of freedom of expression that OIC had consistently been warning against.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *