Ayers: ‘Revolution’ Needed To Stop ‘White Supremacy’

NoisyRoom
Hat Tip: BB

Breitbart.tv:

“I mean, I think the people who practice white supremacy and who benefit from it are going to have to be stopped. And I think that’s a huge undertaking and I think it takes a revolution.”

Share:

Author: Admin

Related Articles

9 thoughts on “Ayers: ‘Revolution’ Needed To Stop ‘White Supremacy’

    1. Well the reason Ayres, the Terrorist is Not in jail, was because
      of some technicality at the time of his arrest/trial,I think.
      This terrroist and agitator, needs to be picked up by police, as he is inciting riots, JUST as he was teaching the OWS HOW to operate when they were protesting.(as well, so was his brother. He, Soros, AND Obama WANT these riots, as they are all promoting them(you can look up past articles)as they think they can ‘harness those voters’. Also, if riots break out in our Republic, then Obama will declare martial law and remain in office. These ‘community organizers/agitators have gotten away with this thuggery too often, as they ALL follow the Alinsky methods of “causing chaos, as before they Know what hit them,(the People) you can move your agenda forward”. This is one of the 13 rules from “Rules For Radicals”, which they are part of.
      Ayres, who “wishes they could have done more, when people were killed by their bombs, should be rotting in prison, along with his wife”

  1. I believe bill ayers and his wife were instrumental in fomenting revolution in the arab spring, which is going to turn out very badly for women and children.

    1. I think you are correct. I also believe it is what Obama wanted, as then, he could have his ‘brethern’, the “Muslim Brotherhood” take over. Notice how they ARE taking over? They are also instrumental in the “American Spring” or OWS, which they are trying to harness for votes for Obama. Just look at who is hiding ‘behind the curtain on these movements and it gives you the WHY.

      1. Sounds to me like Nugent is talking about our right to iiddvniual autonomy and how his fellow citizens have allowed it to be taken away from them through ignorance and apathy.a0 That is fundamentally a non-partisan point of view unless you are a Marxist or Socialist.a0 Exactly the same thing would happen in Canada with another Liberal government.a0 Expressing disgust that others are negligently forfeiting your inherent rights is never a partisan issue.a0 It is, in fact, a duty to your fellow citizens to condemn those that do.VA:F [1.9.11_1134]please wait…VA:F [1.9.11_1134](from 0 votes)

  2. In Bill Ayers ‘world’ if someone disagreed with him, he would have him disposed of. In “our” world, he spouts his hatred against us and he is free and flourishing.
    This intellectual moron cannot see the irony of his position.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.