Senate Seeks to Create Caesar

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

The Apotheosis Of Barack Obama

Senatus Populusque Romanus — Imperius Rex et Populusque Americanus

While all of America is distracted and focused on the death of Osama bin Laden, our President and his minions have been fast at work laying the groundwork for S. 679: Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011 to speed through the Senate and then make its way into the House and then to the President to sign. Yes, the other hand is quickly forming into a dictatorial fist that is about to smash our Constitution.

As you will recall, the beginning of the end of liberty in Rome commenced with Augustus Caesar who compromised the authority of the Senate through the force of arms and basically the Senate became a facade. America is poised with this proposed bill, to morph immediately from a Republic into an empire with the privileged eunuchs of the Senate as window dressing and a dictator – the first American Caesar – at the country’s helm.

And leading the progressive charge is Chuck Schumer (D-NY). No big surprise there. Schumer is an elitist Marxist and a first class progressive who hates America almost as much as he loves power. He introduced S. 679 on March 30th, 2011. He was joined by a gaggle of progressives from the left and the right. This is something I have been warning Americans about for a long time. If we are to survive as a nation, we must rid ourselves of ALL progressives or our nation is doomed and freedom will be swept into the dustbin of history. Schumer’s esteemed list of constitutional traitors is as follows:

From The Heritage Foundation, here is a succinct explanation of the bill:

The bill reduces the number of presidential appointments that require the consent of the Senate and establishes within the executive branch a Working Group on Streamlining Paperwork for Executive Nominations. Individuals nominated to senior executive offices suffer slow and detailed background investigations and mounds of duplicative paperwork before a President sends their nominations to the Senate. After nomination, many nominees suffer time-consuming inaction or time-consuming and excruciating action as the Senate proceeds (or does not) with consideration of the nomination. The sponsors of S. 679 have identified a valid problem, but proposed the wrong solution. Congress should not enact S. 679.

In essence they want to give the President the sole power to appoint people to positions of his choosing within our government. Obama would be free to do this without the approval of the Senate. Senate approval of such positions is mandated by the U.S. Constitution in Article II, Section 2 under the “Appointments Clause”:

… shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments. (emphasis added)

This bill will do away with the checks and balances that separate an American form of government from those such as Venezuela and Brazil. Already we have power mongers such as Cass Sunstein our Regulatory Czar (more commonly known as the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and more aptly titled the Office of Government Propaganda) running amok across the US using agencies such as the EPA as a weapon of regulation and control. There is not a single area in our country that Sunstein does not have his claws sunk deep into. It should scare the crap out of Americans, but all I hear are crickets. The silence of capitulation seals our fate as surely as the thunderous applause of approval – so ends the Republic.

More from The Heritage Foundation:

When the delegates of the states gathered in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 and wrote the Constitution, they distributed the powers of the federal government among two Houses of Congress, a President, and a judiciary, and required in many cases that two of them work together to exercise a particular constitutional power. That separation of powers protects the liberties of the American people by preventing any one officer of the government from aggregating too much power.

The Framers of the Constitution did not give the President the kingly power to appoint the senior officers of the government by himself. Instead, they allowed the President to name an individual for a senior office, but then required the President to obtain the Senate’s consent before appointing the individual to office. Thus, they required the cooperation of the President and the Senate to put someone in high office.

I know Americans have not forgotten about Obama’s string of Czars. Czars that he was supposed to downsize or get rid of. Czars, which in my personal viewpoint, were and still are illegal under the Constitution. But progressives never go away, they just shift… As has done so many of Obama’s Czars. With this sweeping bill, over 200 positions will no longer require Senate approval. Obama will dictate who are his powerful lieutenants and who will control America. The Senate will merely be a sham to parrot Obama’s dictates. With this bill, checks and balances will be effectively nullified.

What does that portend you say? One day, your right to own a gun will be gone, just regulated away. Businesses will be nationalized even more than they are now. Heavy regulation will ensue concerning communications and the Internet. Many, many private businesses will whither and die. You will be told what and how much to eat – food and gas rationing will become the norm. Poverty and squalor will become equal for all as wealth is redistributed to other nations. If there are elections, they will be a joke and pointless. There will be a few powerful elites and then the masses. Guess which camp you and I will be in?

Our best hope at this juncture is that this abomination will be stopped in the House. We must weed out the progressives and we must win in 2012. This country will not survive another four years of progressive policies. Not as a Republic and not as a free entity anyway.

The bitter irony on display here, is that the same jackals that have barked and snarled and feigned horror at “American Imperialism,” are the very ones who now howl their support for a true American empire. All hail Caesar!


Author: Admin

Related Articles

13 thoughts on “Senate Seeks to Create Caesar

  1. Thank you for writing this article and bring this very important unlawful, unconstitutional act brought by another that should be hung for high treason. Iam not surprised by any of this, i am not and with all the executive orders that would allow him to centralize everything under Marshall Law, my god! Ill be calling all that i can and those that will listen.

  2. Yeah, called Ron Paul office, state house member and here in minute I’ll start calling the senators….if they don’t want the job we can cancel our contract with the FEDS!

  3. I’m terrified just reading this. The pieces do seem to be coming together, and the general masses are generally not interested or plain unaware. Are we being alarmists, or is the next and last, devastatng war brewing (if we’re too late for even that)…a truly fightening scenario, and far stranger than the best fiction.

    Endgame? Spooky.

  4. I’m not sure if we can afford to let them do anything more between now an 2012. Keep working on an impeachable offence to un-do everything his administration has done.

    The most important thing is to STOP Obama now.

  5. While many mocked the “Birthers”, anyone looking into Constitutional Law should have easily known that Barack Hussein Obama isn’t even Constitutionally qualified to BE a United States President.
    “No Person except a Natural Born Citizen..shall be eligible to the Office of President….”
    US Constitution: Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

    “…the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.”
    The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414

    Even Obama’s own Leftist Annenburg Fund, which he was once a part of, even they have stipulated that Barack was born a British Citizen, in direct contradiction to what a US Natural Born Citizen means — and hence, in direct contradiction to the US Constitution, stating:

    “…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”

    Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that:
    “The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was …to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and …OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.”

    The “where’s the birth certificate issue” showed that even in Obama’s Long Form forgery, there is NO CLAIM of a United States Natural Born Citizenship, nor that of a 14th Amendment one. Rather, Obama must solely depend on Section 305 of the June 27, 1952 Immigration and Naturalization Act which allows any by presumption to be born in Hawaii to simply be United States Citizens by means of “jus soli”. There is no “sole allegiance to the United States” when one is born a Brit.

    Obama has Usurped the Presidency, and
    Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)@180
    states that
    “a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and “in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land, the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned;
    and not the laws of the United States generally,
    but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution, have that rank.”

    Hence, being unconstitutional, the USA needs to demand Obama’s resignation and arrest, and that the US Supreme Court immediately void out his Presidency and all laws-codes-enactments he put into effect altogether based on the US Constitutional Law and the above previous guidance of the US Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803) @ 180.

  6. I find it interesting that you claim that “Senate approval of such positions is mandated by the U.S. Constitution in Article II, Section 2 under the ‘Appointments Clause'” and then immediately quote language from Article II that says otherwise. The appointments clause allows “Congress … [to] vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone,” and all the officers involved in this bill meet the inferior officer test of Edmond v. United States, so what’s the problem again?

  7. Obama and his administration (+ G. Soros) have been and are quickly dismantling the US Constitution. If they get another four years it may be curtains for the US.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *