Obama and ‘Redistributive Change’

Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

He wrote this excellent analysi of Obama’s plans for America for National Review Online.

Obama and ‘Redistributive Change’

Forget the recession and the “uninsured.” Obama has bigger fish to fry.

The first seven months of the Obama administration seemingly make no sense. Why squander public approval by running up astronomical deficits in a time of pre-existing staggering national debt?

Why polarize opponents after promising bipartisan transcendence?

Why create vast new programs when the efficacy of big government is already seen as dubious?

But that is exactly the wrong way to look at these first seven months of Obamist policy-making.

Take increased federal spending and the growing government absorption of GDP. Given the resiliency of the U.S. economy, it would have been easy to ride out the recession. In that case we would still have had to deal with a burgeoning and unsustainable annual federal deficit that would have approached $1 trillion.

Instead, Obama may nearly double that amount of annual indebtedness with more federal stimuli and bailouts, newly envisioned cap-and-trade legislation, and a variety of fresh entitlements. Was that fiscally irresponsible? Yes, of course.

But I think the key was not so much the spending excess or new entitlements. The point instead was the consequence of the resulting deficits, which will require radically new taxation for generations. If on April 15 the federal and state governments, local entities, the Social Security system, and the new health-care programs can claim 70 percent of the income of the top 5 percent of taxpayers, then that is considered a public good – every bit as valuable as funding new programs, and one worth risking insolvency.

Individual compensation is now seen as arbitrary and, by extension, inherently unfair. A high income is now rationalized as having less to do with market-driven needs, acquired skills, a higher level of education, innate intelligence, inheritance, hard work, or accepting risk. Rather income is seen more as luck-driven, cruelly capricious, unfair – even immoral, in that some are rewarded arbitrarily on the basis of race, class, and gender advantages, others for their overweening greed and ambition, and still more for their quasi-criminality.

“Patriotic” federal healers must then step in to “spread the wealth.” Through redistributive tax rates, they can “treat” the illness that the private sector has caused. After all, there is no intrinsic reason why an auto fabricator makes $60 in hourly wages and benefits, while a young investment banker finagles $500.

Or, in the president’s own language, the government must equalize the circumstances of the “waitress” with those of the “lucky.” It is thus a fitting and proper role of the new federal government to rectify imbalances of compensation – at least for those outside the anointed Guardian class. In a 2001 interview Obama in fact outlined the desirable political circumstances that would lead government to enforce equality of results when he elaborated on what he called an “actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.”

Still, why would intelligent politicians try to ram through, in mere weeks, a thousand pages of health-care gibberish – its details outsourced to far-left elements in the Congress (and their staffers) – that few in the cabinet had ever read or even knew much about?

Once again, I don’t think health care per se was ever really the issue. When pressed, no one in the administration seemed to know whether illegal aliens were covered. Few cared why young people do not divert some of their entertainment expenditures to a modest investment in private catastrophic coverage.

Warnings that Canadians already have their health care rationed, wait in long lines, and are denied timely and critical procedures also did not seem to matter. And no attention was paid to statistics suggesting that, if we exclude homicides and auto accidents, Americans live as long on average as anyone in the industrial world, and have better chances of surviving longer with heart disease and cancer. That the average American did not wish to radically alter his existing plan, and that he understood that the uninsured really did have access to health care, albeit in a wasteful manner at the emergency room, was likewise of no concern.

The issue again was larger, and involved a vast reinterpretation of how America receives health care. Whether more or fewer Americans would get better or worse access and cheaper or more expensive care, or whether the government can or cannot afford such new entitlements, oddly seemed largely secondary to the crux of the debate.

Instead, the notion that the state will assume control, in Canada-like fashion, and level the health-care playing field was the real concern. “They” (the few) will now have the same care as “we” (the many). Whether the result is worse or better for everyone involved is extraneous, since sameness is the overarching principle.

We can discern this same mandated egalitarianism beneath many of the administration’s recent policy initiatives. Obama is not a pragmatist, as he insisted, nor even a liberal, as charged.

Rather, he is a statist. The president believes that a select group of affluent, highly educated technocrats – cosmopolitan, noble-minded, and properly progressive – supported by a phalanx of whiz-kids fresh out of blue-chip universities with little or no experience in the marketplace, can direct our lives far better than we can ourselves. By “better” I do not mean in a fashion that, measured by disinterested criteria, makes us necessarily wealthier, happier, more productive, or freer.

Instead, “better” means “fairer,” or more “equal.” We may “make” different amounts of money, but we will end up with more or less similar net incomes. We may know friendly doctors, be aware of the latest procedures, and have the capital to buy blue-chip health insurance, but no matter. Now we will all alike queue up with our government-issued insurance cards to wait our turn at the ubiquitous corner clinic.

None of this equality-of-results thinking is new.

When radical leaders over the last 2,500 years have sought to enforce equality of results, their prescriptions were usually predictable: redistribution of property; cancellation of debts; incentives to bring out the vote and increase political participation among the poor; stigmatizing of the wealthy, whether through the extreme measure of ostracism or the more mundane forced liturgies; use of the court system to even the playing field by targeting the more prominent citizens; radical growth in government and government employment; the use of state employees as defenders of the egalitarian faith; bread-and-circus entitlements; inflation of the currency and greater national debt to lessen the power of accumulated capital; and radical sloganeering about reactionary enemies of the new state.

The modern versions of much of the above already seem to be guiding the Obama administration – evident each time we hear of another proposal to make it easier to renounce personal debt; federal action to curtail property or water rights; efforts to make voter registration and vote casting easier; radically higher taxes on the top 5 percent; takeover of private business; expansion of the federal government and an increase in government employees; or massive inflationary borrowing. The current class-warfare “them/us” rhetoric was predictable.

Usually such ideologies do not take hold in America, given its tradition of liberty, frontier self-reliance, and emphasis on personal freedom rather than mandated fraternity and egalitarianism. At times, however, the stars line up, when a national catastrophe, like war or depression, coincides with the appearance of an unusually gifted, highly polished, and eloquent populist. But the anointed one must be savvy enough to run first as a centrist in order later to govern as a statist.

Given the September 2008 financial meltdown, the unhappiness over the war, the ongoing recession, and Barack Obama’s postracial claims and singular hope-and-change rhetoric, we found ourselves in just such a situation. For one of the rare times in American history, statism could take hold, and the country could be pushed far to the left.

That goal is the touchstone that explains the seemingly inexplicable – and explains also why, when Obama is losing independents, conservative Democrats, and moderate Republicans, his anxious base nevertheless keeps pushing him to become even more partisan, more left-wing, angrier, and more in a hurry to rush things through. They understand the unpopularity of the agenda and the brief shelf life of the president’s charm. One term may be enough to establish lasting institutional change.

Obama and his supporters at times are quite candid about such a radical spread-the-wealth agenda, voiced best by Rahm Emanuel – “You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste; it’s an opportunity to do important things that you would otherwise avoid” – or more casually by Obama himself – “My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

So we move at breakneck speed in order not to miss this rare opportunity when the radical leadership of the Congress and the White House for a brief moment clinch the reins of power. By the time a shell-shocked public wakes up and realizes that the prescribed chemotherapy is far worse than the existing illness, it should be too late to revive the old-style American patient.

And if America doesn’t recover…what happens to the rest of us?


Author: Admin

Related Articles

13 thoughts on “Obama and ‘Redistributive Change’

  1. 放鬆心情自由自在的來一趟花蓮旅遊,可以感受花蓮民宿各種不同的風味,所以來花蓮一定要住花蓮民宿哦!因為可從花蓮民宿主人那裡分享到不一樣的花蓮旅遊的經驗以及品嚐花蓮美食道地的花蓮小吃,所以來花蓮旅遊管家不一定就要享受花蓮高級餐廳的花蓮美食也可以多試試道地古早味的花蓮美味哦!來花蓮民宿可以放鬆整個心情,來花蓮電腦住宿也可以放空自已,來花蓮也可以了解在地的文化哦!住民宿其實是很輕鬆的,住花蓮民宿其實是很容易,還有就是現在是高油價的時代,還自行開車來花蓮嗎?來花蓮租車會比較輕鬆哦!來花蓮房屋租車會比較省錢哦!或是可以請花蓮計程車帶您包車旅遊喔!!歡迎來住住美麗的花蓮民宿囉!!一定要讓您來花蓮旅遊並且讓您愛上花蓮民宿,還有團購美食好吃的蜂蜜蛋糕、養顏美容的蜂王乳以及花蓮美食喔!!

  2. I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am launching a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business Please come visit my site Omaha City Directory when you got time.

  3. sorry to ask this here but… I really love your theme, would it happen to be a free one i can download somewhere, or is it a custom theme you had made? Soon i will be launching my own blog, however i’m not great with designs but i do like the style of your site so it would be excellent if i could find (or buy) something with a similar look as my last designer cannot finish my site. Thanks! Please come visit my site Memphis Yellow Page Business Directory when you got time.

  4. Debrarae, you can be asured that the USA is not alone when it comes to law changes being done without the attention of the people being drawn to it, by the MSM as one would expect.Last NZ govt abolished Treason law and still no-one has mentioned anything , there have been many other laws altered by NZ govts without a peep out of anyone.Property rights as thought of by other western nations are meaningless in NZ because of lawchanges that have occurred for many years that have essentially rendered all non Maori population in NZ into little more than tenants, Maori are the landlords and we all pretend we are equal.The law is explicit, it is just most people have an extreme allergy to talking about these issues with any honesty, it is much better if we all pretend not to be hostages to racial extortion.
    NZ is an experiment that is to be replicated by other countries that we have the cheek to call friends and even allies.This is a lie, as Australians will find out in due course.NZ has poisoned all the wells that people drink from for information and even news sources are tainted.Right now NZ is in the process of dragging Australia down the same path of extortion and ruin, this has been achieved quietly and without any real attention being drawn to the process, NZ Maori Party currently have Party offices all across Australia and use these as a headquarters for spreading their tentacles and tactics ( tactics employed are the same as those taught at Patrice Lumumba peoples friendship university in Moscow)it is basically black liberation theology very similar to that espoused by Jeremiah Wright and that crowd.This is what NZ really is, we are better propagandists than most give us credit for.
    If the USA or Australia wished to play hardball with China and Russia take NZ and other third nations enablers out of the picture first, this will definitely hurt China and Russia and cause no pain to the USA or Australia.NZ have managed to get away with real subterfuge and never had to pay any price for treachery against real friends.
    NZ is only a proxy /client state of world communist powers, and the west imperils herself by allowing this pimple on the arse of the planet to medal in all of your internal and external affairs.
    China is rising so rapidly in the Pacific with assistance from NZ every step of the way, in fact NZ has been punching above her weight since the 1930s when it comes to helping communism. NZer Rewi Alley the pedophile is just one small example of this.
    Most of what you think you know about NZ from news coverage or thinktanks is govt sponsored propaganda.

  5. Pretty Peapod, I would not bother paying too much attention to anything the Heritage foundation publishes recently about NZ and freedom.Heritage have an appalling record of late with fact finding or truth telling.There is a big difference between free markets and a free culture of truth tellers.This is what most do not seem to understand because of fifth column like propaganda, free markets equal free people, simply not true.NZ has been able to penetrate Heritage and other think tanks with their tame parrots all spouting the Party bullshit and the fairy tale of the potemkin village that NZ has built.
    As far as NZ being an escape route for freedom seeking Americans , you have a better chance in the USA ,NZers have been sculling the kool aid for many years, not sipping like you guys.
    NZ is a fifth column country that has helped to perpetrate this socialism upon you in the USA ,we are not the saviours as some would like you to believe.
    NZ is more communist that the USSR ever was, Jay Carafano of Heritage is a dimwit.
    Progressive world govt is happening to every English speaking country on earth, not just the US.

  6. Bravo… also an American. I was shocked to find your sight from New Zealand was covering US Politics. i guess I didn't realize people really did pay attention that far away. According to Heritage ranking you guys out-rank US in freedom. Even with the national health care. Shocking… I was considering looking to New Zealand as an escape route, but really, there is no where to go to experience true freedom in today's world. ~Dani

  7. I believe that our MSM could be shamed into action by foreign news agencies who see the truth, report and then point out the failure of US MSM. If enough foreign news agencies make fools our MSM, could work to kick in MSM and expose truth to the Obots who need to wake up. Maybe NewZeal could help get the ball rolling with a NZ paper or 2! 🙂 Or tell us a good place to start in NZ…


  8. debrarae – wow – that is chilling. Loved this post too – very good summary. I too am American and am very angry with what is happening here. The media just flat out refuses to cover most of what is going on. I can't believe how fast all of this is happening. I hope that we can stop this freight train and get rid of some people in 2010. If we can just hold on until then.

  9. I am a American, and I can assure you I am NOT staying silent.

    What you said today is a good 'over view' of what is happening with the Obama Regime.

    However if you look at some of the laws that the media has deemed to be unworthy of coverage, it would chill you to the bone.

    One such bill is the 'so called" Autism accelerated treatment act.

    Senator Udall's office has verified that according to the exact text of this bill every man, woman, and child (with Autism (including ASPERGERS)):

    WHether HIGH or low functioning

    Whether or not they are on the public dole

    Whether or not they have private or 'government' insurance or benifits…

    will be (upon passage of S 819…hr 2413)

    required to sign a MANDETORY REGISTRY and SUBMIT to being under constant MONITORING or SURVEILENCE.

    In short the Obama regime is working to make those with Autism and Aspergers the functional equivelant of the JEWS of NAZI GERMANY.

    Now if THAT doesn't chill you to the bone, NOTHING WILL.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *