King John Roberts and his Royal Entourage

By: Cliff Kincaid

They held “No Kings” rallies against President Trump, but a new king, Chief Justice John Roberts, has taken power over the elected president of the United States. Incredibly, on the eve of July 4^th, America’s 250^th anniversary, Republican Chief Justice John Roberts and Republican Amy Coney Barrett gave American citizenship to millions of children of illegal aliens and products of Communist Chinese birth tourism in the Birthright Citizenship case.

The decision “devalues” American citizenship, noted conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, in his powerful dissent.

So the “No Kings” rallies were a big scam, designed to put additional pressure on the Supreme Court to assume the role of King, over President Trump, their pawn. Today, Roberts is King and Barrett is his Queen.

Welcome to another betrayal. This betrayal undermines free and fair elections and the very identity of American citizenship.

Some “conservative” experts like Fox favorite Mike Davis hide behind the fiction that Roberts, Barrett, et. al. are judges for life, a fraudulent assertion NOT found in the Constitution and designed to keep Congress from impeaching these people and removing them from the bench.

They want YOU, the people, to remain dumb.

Roberts and Barrett made a mockery of the oath of citizenship, which declares that “… I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

Remember that, back in 2020, Democrat Senate Leader Schumer stood outside the Supreme Court and leveled a direct threat against Republican-nominated justices, declaring: “You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

That threat was never forgotten, and members of the court took it into account as they deliberated on cases like birthright citizenship and mail-in voting.

There is speculation suggesting that Schumer and his allies may have utilized the unresolved reference to “John Roberts” in flight logs kept by one of Jeffrey Epstein’s two pilots to coerce Roberts into ruling in favor of their political objectives.

A picture of Jeffrey Epstein, a shady predator and a sex pervert who possibly videotaped the rich and famous having sex with young girls and boys, was in the files released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act and showed him wearing a Soviet-style communist Red Star cap.

While media outlets and so-called fact-checkers have asserted that the “John Roberts” listed on the flight manifests is not the Chief Justice, they have failed to identify the true individual associated with that name. For example, PolitiFact said it “found no credible evidence that the person named is the chief justice, as opposed to another person by the same name.” Despite denials and allegations that such speculation is a baseless internet conspiracy theory, the lack of a definitive explanation regarding the identity of the person on those manifests creates a suspicious vacuum.

On my since-restored (by President Trump) YouTube channel, attorney Justin Magill has noted that the Epstein files likely contain critical information and that significant, often opaque, pressure is exerted on prominent figures behind the scenes to manipulate their actions. Based on these circumstances, it is argued that the ambiguity surrounding the flight logs was intentionally maintained to provide Schumer with leverage to blackmail Chief Justice Roberts into supporting specific legislative and legal outcomes.

“There’s a lot of that pressure going on,” Magill said, referring to how prominent figures can be manipulated behind the scenes.

President Trump called it the Swamp.

Significantly, there is no public record of Chief Justice Roberts issuing a personal, direct statement to deny that he was a passenger on flights associated with Jeffrey Epstein or his pilot.

Joe McCarthy is Censured, but Schumer is Not?

You may remember that, decades ago, on a vote of 67 to 22, the Senate censured anti-communist Republican Senator Joe McCarthy for uncovering communists in government. Now communists are openly running for political office! One of them, Graham Platner in Maine, was a self-professed communist with a Nazi tattoo accused of rape!

Don’t forget that Schumer endorsed Graham Platner following his victory in the Maine Democratic primary in June 2026. He later called for Platner to withdraw from the race when his personal baggage became too heavy to carry into the general election.

When Representative Andy Biggs introduced a resolution to condemn Schumer’s remarks, it was a necessary first step. However, it is not enough. Senator Josh Hawley and 14 other patriots in the Senate have already taken the courageous step of introducing a censure resolution, S.Res.532.

But consider this: why did only 15 Senators agree to censure Schumer? It’s because NOT ENOUGH PRESSURE was put on them at the time by you, the American people. Now, far more serious damage has been done in the two major decisions of the court – giving citizenship to the children of illegal aliens and Chinese tourists, and authorizing mail-in votes to be counted after election day when they can be manipulated.

Here are the facts:

In the birthright citizenship case, Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and the three liberals, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
In the mail-in voting case, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the three liberals, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

By the way, the John Roberts court in 2020 dismissed Texas v. Pennsylvania, the lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that sought to challenge election procedures — including the use of illegal mail-in ballots — in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. That meant that Roberts put his stamp on the illegal certification of Joe Biden as the “winner” in the rigged election.

In that case, attorney David G. Evans was an eyewitness to the election fraud which occurred in Detroit, Michigan, and appeared on my YouTube show, subsequently banned by Google. He produced photos of a vote fraud operation in the ballot counting center in which windows were covered by cardboard to prevent objective observers from witnessing what was going on.

Schumer wants communists to win the Senate because he is still setting the stage for public and political unrest should another Supreme Court case be decided contrary to his party’s preference.

A censure of Schumer is the least the Senate can do.

Then the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against Roberts, Barrett, and the three liberals. Do they have the guts?