The Jeffrey Epstein of the American Labor Movement

By: Cliff Kincaid

The “No Kings” movement is another phony “people’s power” campaign that is meant to convince Americans that left-wing “progressives” and their communist allies are in the forefront of establishing a true “democracy” in the United States by terminating our “King,” Donald J. Trump, the President. It is another Soros-funded scam designed to obscure the behind-the-scenes activities of those who intend to destroy our constitutional republic and lie about their motives and intentions.

Now, Mexican-American “progressive” hero Cesar Chavez, who was trained as a revolutionary by Saul Alinsky but was promoted throughout his career as a Christian, has been exposed by the New York Times as a sexual pervert and predator. The paper also exposed how his movement operated as a “cult” in which his followers underwent New Age mind control techniques and followed his arbitrary directives.

The Navy even named a ship after him.

He can today be considered the Jeffrey Epstein of the American labor movement.

Professor Mary Grabar and I discuss his evil “legacy” in my new YouTube program, Moral Degenerates, Sociopaths, and Howard Zinn, about the nature of the “progressive” movement. She wrote the book, Debunking Howard Zinn, about how the communist historian distorted the history of the United States and glorified people like Cesar Chavez.

The Cesar Chavez case should lead to an analysis of how these so-called “people’s power” campaigns emerge on the national scene, seemingly out of nowhere.

In an analysis of how the “No Kings” group is organized and funded, Peter Flaherty of the National Legal and Policy Center says, “it is a top-down operation, whose original funding came from the so-called Open Society Foundations, the massive philanthropic engine of George Soros.”

When the Soviet Union collapsed, Soros picked up the slack for many Marxist and anti-Israel groups.

The last truly organic and legitimate movement of the American people was the Tea Party, created by ordinary Americans in revolt against another expansion of federal power known as Obamacare, the socialist health care scheme. Obamacare, also known as the “Affordable Care Act,” has proven to be not so affordable. “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it,” Obama said, which he knew was a big lie.

Lies are standard operating procedure for the “people’s power” movements popularized by Howard Zinn, the fraudulent leftist “historian” who died and was then “outed” as a communist.

In the case of Cesar Chavez, who emerged as a “savior” of migrant workers organized under his direction into the United Farm Workers Union (UFW), Tom DeWeese writes, “The Leftist college student forces, Hollywood celebrities, and politicians took up the UFW battle cry and promoted the boycotts [of lettuce and grapes]. And so, Cesar Chavez used the media, politicians, Hollywood, and college students to change the buying habits of the nation and paint a picture of big business oppressing the poor.”

We are also told that the “civil rights” movement was a great step forward, except for the fact that it turned into a campaign of racism against whites that became official government policy under Obama and Biden, known as DEI, and is being reversed under President Trump and the Supreme Court. MLK Jr. was associated with the success of the civil rights movement, but his own sexual perversions became a taboo subject so that the “cause” could go forward.

Back Lives Matter, another manufactured “people’s power” movement, was unmasked as designed to destroy what’s left of the black family. A statement about the destruction of the traditional family was deleted from the BLM website after the organization began to attract sympathetic media attention. In fact, the group was founded by three black women, two of whom, Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi, identified as Marxist lesbians and “queer.” Millions in donations were funneled into a Malibu mansion and parties.

Going further back in history, on the occasion of Cesar Chavez Day, March 31, we now understand that the “Farm Workers” movement was another scam, mostly designed to benefit Cesar Chavez personally, as he assembled a harem of women, including those underage, whom he raped and sexually abused.

All of this is belatedly coming out and even being acknowledged by his closest supporters. His 200-acre headquarters was declared a national monument by President Barack Hussein Obama, and he received posthumously the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Clinton.

As the “progressives” try to explain why his sexual proclivities were covered up for decades, we have to understand that this “movement,” like so many other “progressive” campaigns, was considered more important than his own personal conduct and treatment of his fellow human beings.

This is also the case on a global level, as we discovered in the book, The Private Life of Chairman Mao: The Memoirs of Mao’s Personal Physician, which said the mass murderer had a sordid personal life that included:

Addiction to sleeping pills and barbiturates (page 108).
Being “devoid of human feeling, incapable of love…” (page 120).
Sexual orgies (page 358) that included having sex with five women at the same time (page 517).
Homosexuality and using young males to massage his groin (page 359).
STDs, including contracting genital herpes (page 490).

The agenda in the Cesar Chavez case was the expansion of union power, a constituency of the Democratic Party, over America’s agricultural sector. Although Chavez was never identified as a communist himself, those who drew attention to the communists who operated his union behind-the-scenes and therefore helped cover up his sexual perversion were derided as McCarthyites at the time. Trevor Loudon’s website KeyWiki has a good summary of some of these influential personalities.

Research at the time by journalist Gary Allen revealed that Cesar Chavez’s top aides included Luis Valdez, a member of the Marxist Progressive Labor Movement who went to Cuba to study Communist revolutionary methods; Wendy Goepel, a delegate to the Communist Eighth World Youth Festival in Helsinki; and Donna Sue Haber, a founder of the Communist W.E.B. DuBois Clubs who functioned as his secretary.

All of that was ignored at the time because of the propaganda that history was moving in a “progressive” direction, and Chavez was a leader of this new dawn for workers.

Howard Zinn’s “People’s History” of this and other movements is a communist treatment of how the world is supposedly moving toward socialism and communism and away from slavery, feudalism, and capitalism.

Zinn, whose books are force-fed to young people on many college campuses, was not only a member of the Moscow-controlled and Soviet-funded Communist Party USA (CPUSA) but also lied about it, according to his FBI file.

Back in 2010, historian Mary Grabar delivered a magnificent report, “The ‘Bad History’ of Howard Zinn and the Brainwashing of America,” at our “Marxism in America” conference. Her book, Debunking Howard Zinn: Exposing the Fake History That Turned a Generation against America, refutes Zinn in detail.

Zinn is gone, but his brainwashing techniques remain.

In his “A People’s History of the United States,” Zinn portrays the farm workers’ campaign as a rebellion against their “feudal working conditions,” a typical Marxist treatment of the stages in history in which the world is supposedly progressing as it moves toward a communist utopia. Clearly, Zinn saw Cesar Chavez as the leader of a Marxist campaign designed to serve communist ends. However, Chavez seemed more concerned with his own sexual desires and gratification.

Indeed, Zinn quotes the New York Times as praising Cesar Chavez as the “charismatic” leader of the farm workers movement.

Many were fooled by that “charisma” and prepared to overlook and even cover up his extreme and illegal pursuit of physical, sensual, and bodily pleasures.

The collapse of his “charisma” should lead to a reevaluation of the entire “people’s history” of these movements and the motivations and intentions behind their grabs for political power.