By: Cliff Kincaid
A one-night event titled “Hope for America” was held at Utah Valley University (UVU) on November 16, two months after Christian conservative patriot Charlie Kirk was assassinated there. But the sad fact is that, in the wake of the attempted assassinations of President Trump, there should have been a quick realization that Charlie Kirk’s life was in danger, too, but the “authorities,” including the FBI, failed to act.
“God is at work,” Pastor Greg Laurie commented as people moved forward to accept Christ at the “Hope for America” event.
But where was the FBI?
At his memorial service, President Trump declared, “virtually every day for years, before he was murdered, Charlie received these horrible death threats.” President Trump said, “I used to talk to him about it. He said, ‘I got some threats.’”
Speaking to Jesse Watters on Fox News, Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, said her kids get kidnapping and death threats. “We ALWAYS have,” she said.
The follow-up question to FBI Director Kash Patel should be: Why was nothing done to protect Charlie Kirk? The job was left to a few local cops, mostly from the Utah Valley University Police Department (UVUPD).
I have asked Utah Valley University for any information relating to their failure to protect him. They denied any and all documents, offering the following denials:
- …release of records relating to threats would reasonably interfere with investigations and enforcement proceedings…
- Your request for the number of UVUPD members and their names assigned to the event is also denied, as those records are also a record of security measures…
- …records of a governmental entity that could impair an ongoing investigation or enforcement proceeding are classified as protected and would not be released.
Even some “conservatives” are telling me that Charlie Kirk didn’t deserve the special attention of the FBI and that such protection should be reserved for celebrities and sports figures.
One told me, “I don’t believe it is the FBI’s job to protect people as much as to gather and use information that can be useful in a general to specific sense to protect all Americans.”
I disagree. In any case, after the fact, we are now told the FBI will get to the bottom of what happened. But just a few years ago, the FBI was hiring trans people as agents.
Another said to me, “As for the FBI allocating protection to Charlie Kirk, I believe you are wrong. Charlie Kirk was a citizen and citizen only, and an amazing person with his endeavors. However, he was a private citizen, not a politician, and not a royal subject. He therefore did not warrant FBI protection, unless such protection can be requested and paid for by Charlie Kirk.”
Yes, Charlie Kirk was a private citizen. But he was a national and international figure with a close personal relationship with the President and Vice President of the United States. As such, he was the target of many of the same forces that want to terminate President Trump.
He deserved FBI assistance on the same grounds that the President gets Secret Service protection. The FBI should have been investigating and then arresting the members of the LGBTQ “community” that spawned Tyler Robinson and his transgender lover.
It looks increasingly like Thomas Crooks, one of the would-be assassins of President Trump, was a mixed-up young man involved in the trans movement as well.
To its credit, the Associated Press conducted a review of the circumstances surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
The story by Jack Brook began this way:
“The Utah college where conservative leader Charlie Kirk was assassinated lacked several key public safety measures and practices that have become standard safeguards for security at events around the country, an Associated Press review has found.”
I urge you to read the complete story. It is an example of real investigative journalism.
It is too bad that law enforcement authorities, including the FBI, did not conduct such a review BEFORE Charlie Kirk spoke.
After his death, the attention by the hate-America media has shifted to cries by leftists that Kirk had it coming or else that his political enemies have the right to “free speech” to advocate his assassination.
The Democratic candidate for Virginia Attorney General advocated the assassination of a Republican opponent and the deaths of his young children. He won his race.
Meanwhile, the “fake news” Washington Post referred to the gay assassin’s parents as “registered Republicans.” The BBC jumped on the bandwagon, noting that “His parents, Matthew Carl Robinson and Amber Denise Robinson, are registered Republicans, according to state records.”
In a subsequent story, the BBC noted although Utah Governor Cox had previously said that Robinson, a Utah native, was “deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideology,” so-called “public records” that were reviewed by the BBC suggest Robinson “had in the past registered as an unaffiliated, or nonpartisan, voter in Utah,” and that “His parents are registered Republicans, according to state records.”
Again, we see the attempt to blame his “Republican” parents for how he turned out.
The reports about Tyler Robinson’s Republican parents are designed to confuse people about what is going on here. We are being told that the gay assassin, in “love” with his transgender “partner,” was somehow influenced to kill Kirk because of his upbringing.
I agree they bear a large part of the blame, but clearly, as we see in the messages he exchanged with his lover, he was gay and his “partner” was another male, apparently in the process of becoming a girl. That is the definition of trans.
This gets to the crux of the matter, demonstrating that he is part of a pattern of transgenderism being linked to murder and violence.
There is another diversion at work in this controversy.
Consider the statement by George Soros that “The recent murders of Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman have no place in our democracy.”
Peter Flaherty of the National Legal and Policy Center comments that the reference to Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman is bizarre because “In the automobile of Hortman’s murderer were found ‘No Kings’ flyers, related to anti-Trump demonstrations by Soros-funded groups like Indivisible and MoveOn.”
It is more than bizarre. It is deliberate disinformation designed to confuse people about a possible pattern in the attacks and assassination plots.
FBI Director Kash Patel has been taking heat for using the FBI’s private jet to take personal trips to sports events. As Christian conservatives, we must elevate the questioning to a more serious level by asking why he did not direct the FBI to assist Charlie Kirk’s security personnel to prevent what happened on September 10.
As noted, we are also learning that the FBI concealed crucial evidence about Trump’s would-be assassin, Thomas Crooks, and whether he had links to foreign adversaries through his encrypted social media accounts, and whether he was transgender.
The scandal is so big that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told The New York Post that there are “questions” that are “definitely deserving of answers.”
If the FBI does not understand the nature of the “enemies within,” we are in even more peril now that Zohran Mamdani has won the mayor’s race in New York City.
It is indeed a sign of hope that hundreds flooded the altar to choose Christ at the site of the Charlie Kirk murder.
But why has the FBI been so slow? Is the rot that deep?
- Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. usasurvival.org
